New Movie - Improbable Collapse - Scientific Evidence of a Controlled Demolition of the Twin Towers

Film showing scientific evidence of a controlled demolition of the World Trade Center Twin Towers on 9/11.

Improbable Collapse is the first film to thoroughly review the evidence for WTC demolitions from a scientific perspective.

Watch "Improbable Collapse" now for free on Google Video

The film includes an exclusive interview with Steven Jones, a professor of physics at Brigham Young University. Jones argues that the mechanism of the building collapses proposed by US government investigators is extremely unlikely, hence the title of the film. His influential research paper is entitled "Why Indeed did the WTC Towers Collapse?"

The original version of Improbable Collapse enjoyed a successful premiere on April 9th in New York City and follow-up showing at the Chicago conference in June. At both events, we acquired new images and interviews that we believe greatly enhance the film.

Most significantly, we took advantage of new opportunities to complete our work by adding interviews with Glenn Corbett, Kevin Ryan, and Steven E. Jones.

Kevin Ryan was dismissed from his executive position at Underwriters Laboratories in 2004, after the public release of a letter he wrote to Frank Gayle, a scientist in the World Trade Center fire investigation. Ryan asked Gayle to clarify the results of a UL fire test on behalf of the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST). In the test, steel structures similar to those used in the WTC were subjected to furnace fires for two hours at temperatures higher than those in the Twin Towers on September 11th. The steel withstood the test easily, and Ryan concluded this raised serious concerns about the NIST collapse hypothesis.

This is the first interview Kevin Ryan has granted on film.

Glenn Corbett, a professor of fire science at John Jay College in New York, serves as a lead adviser to the Skyscraper Safety Campaign. He has been outspoken in criticizing the rapid scrapping of steel recovered from the Ground Zero site, and the resulting handicap to all investigations of the collapse mechanism. However, Corbett provides a balancing perspective with his strong support of the widely accepted hypothesis that the Twin Towers came down as the result of plane hits and damage from fire, and that WTC 7 fell due to damage caused by the fall of the other buildings and subsequent fire.

Watch "Improbable Collapse" now for free on Google Video

WTC

Watched about a half hour of it and I will watch the rest when I have time.

Interesting

I think that there are some factors being left out of the video. In direct comparison to other buildings that have endured fires of that scale, none to my knowledge had a jumbo jet smash into them.

The video evidence that we have all seen from that day shows that there was no noticeable amount of debris that exited the buildings in both crashes, which tells me that 90-95% of the materials that the planes were composed of was scattered throughout the buildings interior. Leading me to believe that there was an enormous amount of damage to these buildings, not to mention that they were among the largest and tallest in the world.

When you consider that shortly after the impacts that gravity becomes a factor that is constantly working against you it still adds up to me that the buildings fell.

I have a very hard time believing that this disaster needed any extra help.

Gravel,

WTC reply

I surely hope you watch the rest of the film, you might find your questions answered. Also, another movie to check out is 9/11 Mysteries, it's also posted on my blog, free to watch on Google Video of course. The last half of the video has the best evidence shown.

This is not a theory

This is not a theory anymore. Every demolition expert can confirm it. The thing is, why did our leaders felt the need to lie to us? Who is behind it all? Who is guilty for doing this?
---
Mary-Anne Davis, flood damage repair specialist.